Search for: All records

Abstract The diurnal cycle of precipitation plays a crucial role in regulating Earth's water cycle, energy balance, and regional climate patterns. However, the diurnal precipitation across mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA) and the factors influencing its spatial variations are not fully understood. In this study, we investigated diurnal precipitation patterns in summertime (June–August) from 2002 to 2005 over MSEA using ground‐based observations, satellite products, the global ERA5 reanalysis, and high‐resolution simulations from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model at 9‐ and 3‐km grid spacing forced by ERA5 hourly data on ∼0.25° grids. Various observation‐based data sets including GHCN‐Daily, Multi‐Source Weighted‐Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP), Asian Precipitation ‐ Highly‐Resolved Observational Data Integration Towards Evaluation of Water Resources (APHRODITE), and Integrated Multi‐satellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) were used. In evaluating daily precipitation over MSEA, MSWEP, and APHRODITE data sets show similar patterns in precipitation amount, frequency, and intensity, while IMERG tends to produce higher amounts but with less frequency. ERA5 overestimates light precipitation compared to the other data sets. The WRF simulations generally produce heavier but less frequent light precipitation, with the 3‐km simulation producing less intense precipitation than the 9‐km simulation. A k‐means classification of IMERG data revealed five distinct spatial regimes with varying diurnal precipitation cycles. The WRF simulations closely match these regimes, capturing key diurnal cycles missed by ERA5 over mountainous regions and coastlines. Additionally, convective activities and near‐surface winds influence these cycles, with WRF simulations better representing coastal and mountain precipitation patterns than ERA5. High‐resolution WRF simulations, especially the 3‐km simulation, capture diurnal precipitation more accurately than ERA5, highlighting the importance of employing convection‐permitting models to simulate precipitation diurnal cycles over complex terrain. 

Abstract Daily floods including event, characteristic, extreme and inundation in the Lancang‐Mekong River Basin (LMRB), crucial for flood projection and forecasting, have not been adequately modeled. An improved hydrological‐hydrodynamic model (VIC and CaMa‐Flood) considering regional parameterization was developed to simulate the flood dynamics over the basin from 1967 to 2015. The flood elements were extracted from daily time series and evaluated at both local and regional scales using the data collected from in‐situ observations and remote sensing. The results show that the daily discharge and water level are both well simulated at selected stations with relative error (RE) less than 10% and Nash‐Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) over 0.90. Half of the flood events haveNSEexceeding 0.76. The peak time and flood volume are well reproduced while both peak discharge and water level are slightly underestimated. The results tend to worsen when the characteristics of flood events are extended to annual extremes. These extremes are generally underestimated withNSEless than 0.5 butREis within 20%. The simulated rainy season inundation area generally agrees with observations from remote sensing, with about 86.8% inundation occurrence frequency captured within the model capacity. Ignoring the regional parameterization and reservoir regulation can both deteriorate flood simulation performance at the local scale, resulting in lowerNSE. Specifically, systematically higher water levels and up to 27% overestimation of peak discharge are found when ignoring regional parameterization, while ignoring reservoir regulation would cause up to 23% overestimation for flood extremes. It is expected that these findings would contribute to the regional flood forecasting and flood management.